That Foolish Cross

The message about the Cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.  (1 Corinthians 1:18)

In the last chapter of his book, “Just Mercy,” Bryan Stephenson introduces us to “an older black woman” who “looked tired and wore what [we] used to call a ‘church meeting hat.’”  Stephenson, a lawyer, has just won the release of a man who’d been sentenced to life in prison as a sixteen year old boy, whose confession to his crime had been beaten out of him by police.  He’d been in prison for forty-five years.

Stephenson thinks he has seen the woman at the courthouse before, but he can’t figure out who she is, so he goes over to her and asks if she is a relative of the man who’s case has been won.

“‘I’m not related to nobody here,’” she says, “‘I just come here to help people.  This is a place full of pain, so people need plenty of help around here.’”

She goes on, “‘My sixteen-year-old grandson was murdered fifteen years ago....  I grieved and grieved.  I asked the Lord why he let someone take my child like that.  He was killed by some other boys....  Those boys were found guilty ... and the judge sent them away to prison forever.  I thought it would make me feel better but it actually made me feel worse....

“‘I sat in the courtroom after they were sentenced and just cried and cried.  A lady came over to me and gave me a hug and let me lean on her.  She asked me if the boys who got sentenced were my children, and I told her no.  I told her the boy they killed was my child.  She sat with me for almost two hours... we didn’t neither of us say a word...  It felt good to... have someone to lean on....’”

“‘All these young children being sent to prison forever, all this grief and violence....  I decided I was supposed to be here to catch some of the stones people cast at each other.’”  (Bryan Stephenson, “Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption”, Spiegel & Grau, New York, 2015, p. 306-308)

This is not a sermon about the injustice of sentencing children to a lifetime in prison, or any other aspect of cruelty meted out in the name of Justice.  This is a sermon about an older black woman who finds that her grief at the murder of her grandson is compounded, not alleviated, when the children who committed the crime are sentenced to spend the rest of their lives in prison.  Which is to say that this is a sermon about a woman who discovers that God’s foolishness is wiser than human wisdom, and God’s weakness is stronger than human strength.

Can you imagine trying to console such a woman?  Can you imagine how you would react when she told you that these fresh tears of hers were falling for the boys who murdered her grandson?

These are not even stories about children who were wrongfully accused or punished.  There is foolishness aplenty to go around: there is violence, there is cruelty; there is hatefulness and sheer stupidity; there is anger and resentment; there is crime, and there is punishment.  And there is precious little wisdom, precious little wisdom in the world... and precious little mercy.  But there is a woman with a hat, whose own pain did not obliterate the possibility of mercy, a woman who found that God’s foolishness is wiser than human wisdom, and God’s weakness is stronger than human strength.

“The message about the Cross is foolishness,” Saint Paul tells us.  Yes, he does go on; but let’s start with the foolishness.  Let’s acknowledge that Saint Paul is correct, and that more and more of the world sees it this way.

“Hopelessly male-dominated and irretrievably patriarchal,” is the way a father recently told me his twenty-something daughters view the church and its texts that transmit to us the story of the Cross.

“Completely un-interested and utterly un-convinced,” is the way a mother recently told me her tween-aged children assess the church and our God.

They might have told me that the message of the Cross is foolishness, as far as their children are concerned.

There ought to be some calculus in the universe that helps us make sense of the world.  There ought to be a glass through which we could look to discern the truth, scales we could use to weigh real justice.  There ought to be a key one could possess that would ensure real insight.   There ought to be a secret you could learn to unlock the mysteries of life, and another that would unlock the mysteries of death.  There ought to be an answer to the question, Why?  There ought to be a way to know whatever it is that needs to be known.  There ought to be a balm to soothe the pain.  There ought to be a pattern to unscramble from all this mess.   There ought to be a priest who knows the secrets.  There ought to be a reason, yes, there ought to be a reason.

But there is no calculus, no glass and no scale.  There is no key, no secret, no answer, no way to know, no balm, no pattern, no priest, and no reason that we know of.  So often there is no reason.  But there is the Cross, casting the shadow of its saving promise over the whole of creation.  

The Cross is a black hole of death, drawing all the matter and energy of death toward itself with irresistible power, and challenging every calculus, every glass, every scale, and key, and secret, and answer, and way, and balm, and pattern, and priest, and every reason; and proclaiming by sheer force of power its own foolishness.

What a ridiculous way to save the world: with a man in all his weakness bleeding, suffocating, and dying on a Cross, without so much as stopping to explain to us how this is supposed to work; why it’s good for us.  But the Cross is not an instrument of logic; it is an instrument of grace.  And it is matter of divine mercy that true grace is not governed by logic;  if it was, who of us would be saved?  If, at the Cross, where the Son of God flung himself into the black hole of death to overcome death’s power, God had paused to check the receipt and make sure the math added up correctly, the sky would not have darkened, the curtain of the Temple would not have been torn in two, the earth would not have shaken - not without also allowing the man who hung there to leap from his doom and dance on the heads of his persecutors.  But, for whatever reason, that is not how God works.  Call him a mystery; he is to me.  If God were to check the receipt in my case, there is no way he would have sent his Son to die: this much I know.  I am a sinner who is in need of mercy, not logic.  Maybe you know this about yourself, as well.  And maybe this is the crucial insight that allows us to embrace the foolishness of the Cross: when we know we are being saved, because we know we need to be saved.

When I look at the world today so much of it makes no sense to me.  About the only thing that does make sense are those videos one comes across on the Internet that tell the stories of the dog that adopted a piglet to care for it, or the kitten who frolics with a crow, or the lioness who raises an orphaned baby antelope as her own offspring.  These tiny and comical stories open up glimpses of a world that we think for a moment might be possible, but on reflection we see them for the foolishness they are: you can’t organize the world around the expectation that kittens and crows will play together, or that lions will foster antelopes.

Well, you can’t organize the world around something as foolish as the Cross, either.  Which is why we have organized the church around it instead.

On the last page of his book, as Bryan Stephenson is trying to render some meaning from the sorrow, pain, and suffering that he has seen and known, he draws this conclusion, “Mercy is most empowering, liberating, and transformative when it is directed at the undeserving.” (Stephenson , p 314)  He could have been writing a caption for the Cross, whose power, liberation, and transformation are always offered to the undeserving: to me and to you, for instance.

Some day, when God’s kingdom is finally established, there will be justice on the earth, and there will be peace.  Some day.  But until then let us pray that there will be women in church meeting hats who are given the grace to weep for the suffering of their own children’s killers.  And let us try to learn from such women.  For to do so is to learn about God, and how God’s heart must operate, if God’s foolishness is wiser than human wisdom; and to learn about how God’s fortitude may be given, if God’s weakness is stronger than human strength.  To encounter such a woman, and to accept her invitation to lean on her is to realize that she maybe catching stones that were meant to strike you.   And to embrace her, and maybe not to say a word, but to allow the tears to flow, is to discover that the message about the Cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God!

Preached by Fr. Sean Mullen
5 March 2018
Saint Mark’s Church, Philadelphia

Keep the Rainbows Coming

It is possible that we have not yet grasped the significance of this important narrative:

Chapter One is in the beginning when the earth was a formless void, and darkness covered the face of the deep. And God speaks, and by the end, there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day.

In Chapter Two there’s another beginning.  And God makes Adam out of the dust, and breathes life into him. And God puts Adam in a garden, and takes a rib from him to make Eve.  And the man and his wife were both naked, and were not ashamed.

A serpent appears in Chapter Three, who wreaks havoc by appealing to Adam and Eve in a most rational but deadly way.  And by the end of that day, such as it was, God drove them out, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a sword flaming and turning to guard the way to the tree of life.

In Chapter Four, Cain murders Abel, his brother, which is more than enough for one chapter, so early in the history of the world.  And at that time people began to invoke the name of the Lord.

In Chapter Five, we hear of the descendants of Adam and Eve, all the way to Noah, who is of no interest to us until he was five hundred years old, the father of Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

In Chapter Six, things begin to heat up.  “The Lord saw that the wickedness of humankind was great in the earth....  Now, the earth was corrupt in God’s sight, and the earth was filled with violence.  And God said, ‘I am sorry that I have made them.’”  And he went to Noah (who had found favor in the sight of the Lord), with his plan.

Chapter Seven brings the flood, and the ark, and the animals two by two; the forty days of rain, and the waters, swollen on the face of the earth.

In Chapter Eight, Noah opens the window of the ark and sends out the dove.  And eventually the dove comes back with an olive leaf in its beak.  And Noah, and his family, and all the animals at last get to leave the ark, and populate the now desolate earth.  And the first thing that Noah does is build an altar, and make a burnt sacrifice to the Lord.  “And when the Lord smelled the pleasing odor, the Lord said in his heart, ‘I will never again curse the ground because of humankind, for the inclination of the human heart is evil...; nor will I ever again destroy every living creature as I have done.’”

And in Chapter Nine, beautiful, gorgeous, marvelous Chapter Nine, God stops giving Noah orders, and instead, God establishes a covenant of trust with Noah “that never again shall all flesh be cut off by the waters of a flood, and never again shall there be a flood to destroy the earth.”

“God said, ‘This is the sign of the covenant that I make between me and you, and every living creature that is with you for all future generations: I have set my bow in the clouds, and it shall be a sign of the covenant between me and the earth.  When I bring clouds over the earth and the bow is seen in the clouds, I will remember my covenant that is between me and you....  When the bow is in the clouds, I will see it and remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature.’”

I often think that this story must first have been told by a father (or mother) whose child looked up to the sky after a storm and saw a rainbow, and asked her father where rainbows come from.  And I imagine that marvelous father (or mother), whose imagination must have been stoked by the religious stories of his own time, telling the story of Noah by way of explaining where rainbows come from; and what a great reminder rainbows are of God’s love for us.  And I could be right about that.  But in imaging it this way, I tend to overlook an important detail of the story of Noah and the ark, and the flood and the rainbow.  I tend to overlook that although God explains the sign of the covenant to Noah, he never tells Noah that the rainbow is a sign meant for him and his descendants.  Quite the contrary, God says that sign of the rainbow is meant for his own divine eyes.  “When the bow is in the clouds, I will see it and remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature...”.  I will see it, myself, says God.  I will see it, and remember.

God must have known that we would try his patience.  

And now I wonder if maybe the story was first told by a father (or mother) to his frightened child, shivering and shaking, held snug by his parent’s arm, just as the rain began to fall in large, heavy drops that pelted the ground, and silenced the birds, and stung as they hit the back of a child’s neck, and sent squirrels running for shelter, and found the dog cowering under the bed, as the sky darkened, and this poor child, to whom so much in the world was still new, saw great puddles form and rivers swell in which any number of things could drown, and heard the furious rainfall and the thunder, and saw the awful flashes of lightning, and wondered if the world, her world, was coming to an end as the thunder crashed.

“Oh no, my child,” her father (or mother) might have told her, “the world will not end because of this storm.  And when this rain finally stops coming down, I can prove it to you.  For God will put a sign in the clouds.  And you must never be afraid of a storm, because God himself will see the sign, and he will remember his covenant of trust.  And all will be well.”

I read somewhere recently that Lent is that time of the Christian year when we commemorate the forty days that Jesus spent in the wilderness, tempted by Satan.  And because Lent is, indeed, forty days long (if you don’t count Sundays), and because the Gospel reading today does, indeed, call to mind our Lord’s sojourn in the wilderness, I worry that we might for a while labor under the same mistaken idea, that Lent is a commemoration of Jesus’ wilderness temptation.  This would be a most unfortunate and superficial conclusion to reach, since it leaves you and me conveniently out of the equation, as mere on-lookers.

Lent’s greater usefulness is not as a time merely to re-tell the long-ago story of Jesus’s temptation in the wilderness.  The collect for today puts it this way, “Almighty God, whose blessed Son was led by the Spirit to be tempted by Satan: Come quickly to help us who are assaulted by many temptations; and, as you know the weaknesses of each of us, let each one find you mighty to save….”  Yes, the context of Lent is the memory of Jesus’ temptation in the wilderness, but the substance of the season is our own need for God to come quickly to help us, and save us.  And as we recognize our need for God to save us from ourselves, we remember, too, that once God said of us that “the inclination of the human heart is evil....”  What a dismal indictment that is.

Most of the time I want to push back against this charge.  Most of the time I want to suggest that the God of love would never say such a thing, never think such a thing... and I hope I am right about the way I see this most of the time.  Most of the time I want to believe that God could never have thought, let alone said out loud, “I am sorry that I made them,” as Genesis reports that God once said.  This is the type of thing abusive parents say to their children, and we must tread very carefully when we allow for the possibility that such a thought could ever cross the mind of God.  But there have been times lately when it has seemed plausible to me that God could have thought such a thing, if he looked down, and saw that the wickedness of humankind is great in the earth.

Indeed, this is an awful indictment, and one for which I could supply ample evidence from last week’s papers alone.  But the fact remains that God has not stopped finding favor with us, despite our wicked tendencies, and the ease with which we give in to temptation.  And we gather here, not to be indicted over and over again on account of our wickedness, but because of God’s unfailing favor, made manifest in the gift of his Son.  And we realize that God didn’t call us together to be a church merely so we could remember how bad we are, recalling together the old stories of our un-faithfulness.  He called us together to sanctify us and to save us, and so that he would know that he doesn’t mean it, and never did, when he hears us read in church that once he said, “I am sorry that I made them.”

The weather notwithstanding, on Ash Wednesday I must admit that it felt to me as if the rain had began to fall again in large, heavy drops that pelted a school, and silenced the birds, and stung viciously as they hit the children, and sent them ducking for shelter, and found the dog cowering under the bed, as the sky darkened, and puddles of blood formed, and the sound and fury, and the thunder, and the awful flashes of lightning were almost enough to make me wonder, in a way, if the world, our world, was coming to an end, as the casings rattled to the ground, and we had to count to seventeen.

It made me ask, sincerely and urgently, What is wrong with us?  Is the inclination of the human heart really so evil?  Is our wickedness really so great?

We come shivering and shaking into God’s presence, and we might well have these questions on our minds.  We might even wonder if God is sorry that he made us.  Which is why we need to remember again about the covenant, and about the sign of the rainbow.  And we need to recall what God told Noah, “When the bow is in the clouds, I will see it and remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature...”.  I will see it, myself, says God.  I will see it, and remember.

This is not the first time I have found myself praying for a rainbow.  And I fear it shall not be the last.  And as I have a pretty good idea about the extent of my own weaknesses, and those of the human condition, I am praying that God will come quickly to help us, and that we will find God mighty to save.  And that he will keep the rainbows coming, please, keep the rainbows coming!

Preached by Fr. Sean Mullen

18 February 2018

Saint Mark’s Church, Philadelphia

Amateur Night

This morning as I was flipping through my Washington Post app, I saw an article with the intriguing title “It’s Okay to Go Out on Valentine’s Day.” In my imagination, the article was going to be about the question of whether it is appropriate for Catholics – Roman or Anglican – to go out for a fancy dinner on this particular Valentine’s Day, which also happens to be Ash Wednesday. I imagined an analysis of this year’s liturgical calendar, which amusingly pairs not only Ash Wednesday and Valentine’s Day but also Easter Day and April Fool’s Day. I imagined a history of the tradition of fasting, a description of different types of fasts, and an expert opinion on whether an intimate dinner for two tonight should include things like champagne, or chocolate truffles, or a porterhouse.

Instead, the article, written by reporter Maura Judkis, is about the disdain with which most foodies, including chefs and others in the food industry, view dining out on Valentine’s Day. This disdain is not directed towards the food itself, although Judkis did dedicate a few paragraphs to the disappointing and disappointingly expensive prix fixe menus many restaurants offer on this holiday. No, the disdain Judkis wrote about is the disdain with which foodies and chefs view the people who go out to dinner on Valentine’s Day. As one chef put it, these people are “a completely different demographic” from their normal customers. These people are those who don’t regularly dine at fine restaurants. These people are those who have had to save up for a nice meal out, for whom “fine dining” conjures up images of surf and turf and chocolate lava cake, not the Sweet Onion Crepe with Parmesan and White Truffle Fondue and Duck with Tardivo, Puntarella, and Sauce Genovese you might find at a restaurant like, say, Vetri.* These people are likely to order their steak well done. They’re likely to ask for Thousand Island dressing. They’re likely to order a glass of white zinfandel or – gasp! – merlot. These diners, some snooty chefs complain, are looking for haute cuisine but wouldn’t know it if they accidentally stabbed it with a fork. And so these chefs give this night a particularly cynical, snobbish nickname: Amateur Night.

Now I saw some of you blanch when I mentioned white zinfandel. And I will confess to you that I myself have rolled an eye a time or two when overhearing people order their steak with no pink and their wine with an ice cube. Thank God that today is a day for confession and repentance, am I right? Judkis has this to say about such snobbery: “Knock it off.” Stop being cynical about people who want to “splurge on stereotypical romantic meals,” she says. Just stop. Knock it off. Go out for Valentine’s Day, she tells her readers, and don’t let anybody talk you out of your white zin. Drink it all, even with an ice cube, and have a lovely night.

Setting aside its decided lack of advice on how to integrate the Lenten fast with the traditional indulgences of Valentine’s Day – a topic we can safely skip because it’s after 7 now, and you’re here, so I’m guessing you’ve figured that out for yourselves – Judkis’s article is an interesting lens with which to view our own experiences of Lent. For who among us has not at some point in our lives felt like a bit of an amateur when it comes to Lenten disciplines? We’re feeling pretty good about deciding to give up diet Coke, but then we hear about someone who’s eating only one meal a day or meditating for three hours every night and suddenly our diet Coke fast seems a little bush-league. We know we’re not supposed to rank our Lenten practices like they were an Olympic sport, but sometimes it’s hard to avoid the comparisons. Because our Lenten practices are important. We know what the season of Lent means to us and to the world, and so we want to do Lent well. Of course we want to find a practice that feels significant, that challenges us, or perhaps that proves that we have a sophisticated palate for self-denial. Who wants to be known as just a “different spiritual demographic” from those saintly souls who really get what Lent is about? Who wants to hear someone in the next pew call this gathering Amateur Night?

Let us take some comfort in the knowledge that there was no greater gathering of spiritual amateurs than the crowds listening to Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount. These were not professional theologians sitting at Jesus’ feet. These were not the ministers who were trained to stand between the vestibule and the altar and weep. These people were just amateurs. They worshiped, yes. They paid for sacrifices in the temple when they could. They blessed their bread and wine and prayed for God’s guidance and favor and mercy. But for the most part they were completely new at this. Jesus’ entire ministry was new; these people were just beginning to hear and see what Our Lord had to show them. They had hopes, maybe even expectations, but they had no idea what they were getting into; even the spiritual leaders in the crowd, including the disciples, were far from experts.

Jesus knows this. He knows that these people are harassed and helpless and hungry for something they can scarcely define. He knows that they are spiritual amateurs, and yet he feeds them anyway. He feeds them anyway, and with real food. He offers sophisticated sustenance about being blessed even when you suffer. He employs delicate, subtle flavors in his teaching about forgiveness; he brings out the essence of the law which includes not only what the people do or say but also how they think and feel. He offers them real food from a banquet table rich with truth, and he fully expects that even these amateurs will eat. When you pray, he says, not if. When you pray, when you fast, when you give alms – when you practice your faith, always remember the maker who gave you that faith in the first place. And your maker who sees in secret will reward you.

The truth is that we’re all amateurs when it comes to the spiritual life. We’re all looking for things that are truly just a fraction of what God can give. We find ourselves quite happy with the prix fixe because we can’t imagine what might be on the regular menu. We order Thousand Island dressing when God has prepared something far more glorious than just mayo, Worcestershire, and ketchup. We’re total amateurs, and God knows this. He knows that we are hungry for something we can scarcely imagine. He knows this, and he feeds us anyway. He feeds us anyway, and with real food. When we come here looking for small grace, when we come here looking for easy answers, when we come here looking for nothing, when we come here and we don’t know what we’re looking for, God feeds us with nothing less than his whole self, with the body and blood of his only Son Our Lord, given for you and for me.

So blow the trumpet in Zion and call a solemn assembly. For this is Amateur Night, my friends, and the beginning of Amateur Season. For what better time than the season of Lent to remember that our God is gracious and merciful to us, even in those times when we feel like we couldn’t find our faith even if we accidentally stabbed it with a fork? So if you’re worried about being an amateur, knock it off. You are, and that’s okay. If you’re worried that your Lenten disciplines lack even a soupcon of sophistication, knock it off. Who needs sophistication? If you want to fast, fast. If you want to pray more, pray more. If you want to give away more, give away more. Just whatever you decide to do, do it because it will please the God who is madly in love with you. And whatever else you decide to do, please do go out for these next forty days. Go out, go right there to that altar. Don’t let anybody talk you out of it. Eat and drink it all, and have a lovely Lent.

*Yes, I actually did pull these items from Vetri’s current tasting menu.

Preached by Mother Erika Takacs

Ash Wednesday, 14 February 2018

Saint Mark's Church, Philadelphia