Who Are These?

You may listen to Father Mullen's Sermon here.

Who are these, robed in white… and where have they come from?  (Rev 7:13)

Ftr Mullen 11_2_14
My Recording
Photo by Ashley Gilberston for the NY Times, 5/25/2013

Photo by Ashley Gilberston for the NY Times, 5/25/2013

There is a room inside a building about 80 miles from here where the uniforms of the fallen are prepared for bodies before burial.  The fit and the name and the rank must all be correct, of course, but so must the ribbons of the decorations that are pinned to uniforms, high on the left breast.  And the soldier-morticians who prepare these uniforms snap a photo of the arrangement of ribbons to send to superiors far away, to make sure they are absolutely correct.

I’ve been a little haunted by a photo last year in the New York Times that showed one such mortician-soldier, dressed in his fatigues, bent over a table on which lay the dress blues of an Army captain, adorned not only with his name and rank, but also with the insignia of an aviator, and the ribbons for a Purple Heart, Overseas Service Badge, and Bronze Star, among others.  The uniform is laid out just as the body will be: white gloves emerging from blue sleeves, black socks peeking out from hemmed trousers.

From the details of this uniform alone, the Staff Sergeant could tell us a thing or two about who the man is whose body it will soon clothe.  And the military is very good about this part of death: about saying who this soldier is.  The flip side of this concern is that careful attention the military pays even to the remains of those whom we cannot name, when we cannot say who it is.  Somehow an extra measure of care, along with an extra measure of grief is found for those whose names we cannot know.

In the photo in the Times, seven other uniforms hang behind the hunching figure of the mortician-soldier – other branches and genders represented there – making it clear that this is not an isolated moment, but part of a bigger process of death, and the way we must mark it for those we honor, and whose memory we are compelled to cling to one way or another.

What is happening in that room in the mortuary at Dover Air Force Base seems to have something to say about the way the slain soldier lived, and something about the way he died.  What is happening in that room has something important and powerful to say to those who may peer into the casket of their beloved child, husband, brother, father.  We are trying hard to affix every bit of value and honor that we can to a life taken too soon in the planned tragedy of war.  But whatever is being said by what is happening in that room comes to a full stop with the plaintive punctuation of Taps, and with a folded flag, and with the inadequate condolences of a grateful nation.

Maybe you have been to a military cemetery, with the neat rows of crosses or tombstones silently parading across the green grass.  Maybe you have visited the grave of one of the 5,281 men and women who have been killed in combat serving this nation in Iraq and Afghanistan, or one of the 53,402 US servicemen and women killed in the Great War that began a hundred years ago, or one of the 47,424 who perished in Vietnam – not to mention the non-combat deaths in each of those conflicts, and many others.

I look out over that vast sea of war dead, and I hear the question: “Who are these, who have come out of the great ordeal?”

I imagine that there is another room, although it may be further away.  And unlike the room in Dover this one is not reserved for military use.  And here, too, perhaps the dead are laid out.  And perhaps there is an attendant who looks lovingly at the ruined bodies of the dead, and strokes fingers through their hair, and fiercely grasps their hands in his or hers – if there is a hand to grasp.  And the attendant takes the measure of the departed ones with only a trained eye, and places a hand over the closed eyes, and prays.

And perhaps through some sophisticated circuitry the attendant can see the whole story of a life played out – military or civilian, it hardly matters.  But there are no shelves behind the attendant, lined with ribbons for decorations; and there are no uniforms hanging there.  There is no rank to bother with, and no nametag to worry about.  There is only the attendant and this prayer, with hands placed softly over closed eyelids.  The attending fingertips assist the somewhat stiffened eyelids as they retract again to let light in.

And the room is much larger than I imagined it was at first.  There are attendants as far as they eye can see bending slightly over the bodies of the dead, shielding their eyes from the returning light.  And at some stations the attendants have nothing more to work with than a pile of ashes, but this does not impede them in their work.  And without moving their lips, I can hear the attendants asking as I watch them: “Who are these?  Who are these?”

And by some process that I cannot account for the bodies arise from their repose, or from their ashes, and as they do, not only are they restored, but they are clothed in white.  Or at least this is the closest I can come to describing what is actually indescribable, for the light is not like any light I have ever seen before, and the bodies, once ruined, decayed, or reduced to ash, are now identifiable, yet somehow different from what I thought a body should look like.  And if I say they are clothed in white, then you will imagine diaphanous dalmatics that might fasten in the back, or button at the neck, and that could tear, or be tripped on, or get caught on the decoration of a pearly gate – but this is all far too literal, too earth-bound a way of imagining what I imagine I see in this room where the dead are attended to as they are ushered into new life.  And it also misses the point, which is that it is no longer about the clothes or the body – since both have been transformed into some new state; no longer about name, or rank, or status, or station.  But now it is only about the question that is coming from nowhere and from everywhere at the same time: “Who are these?  Who are these?  Who are these?”

Curiously, in the vision of his Revelation, when St. John is shown the great multitude of saints, robed in white, with palm branches in their hands, singing in harmony, the question, “Who are these?” is not posed by St. John, it is posed to him by one of the twenty-four elders, seated on thrones before the Lamb, as if he should know.  Of course, the elder knows the answer to the question, and if the expectation is that St. John also knows it, then I suppose that the question is asked really for our benefit, so that we may know too: Who are these?

Who are these?  Who are these?  This is the question of All Saints, as we allow our memories to be carried into holy realms: Who are these? – as if we should know!

We resist, today, the urge to compile lists – we don’t even sing a litany of the saints.  We tell ourselves (whether we know it or not) that we both know and don’t know who these are.  But we do know who they are.  We know they are the saints, washed in the blood of the Lamb.  But we also realize that we cannot possibly know who they all are – since they are a “great multitude that no one could count.”  It is precisely part of the ancient teaching of the church that we cannot keep track of all the saints because they are too numerous to count and to name; and if we tried, we would surely omit more than we knew.

I am assuming that some of the saints arrived in dress blues with their names, and their rank, and their ribbons all just so.  But no matter the circumstances whence they came, the honor and the dignity they may have received in life or in death is nothing compared to the glory revealed to them in the heavenly realms.

Who are these?  The irony of the question is that even though we know who they are, we cannot possibly know, cannot possibly account for them all.  And yet the question insists upon itself, perhaps for that very reason: Who are these?

When fear and uncertainty are at hand, and we wonder whether the church can continue to do her work, whether dreadful decline and failure may be our lot, as the world around us seems to think it can do perfectly well without us, the question imposes itself in our midst: Who are these?

When we stare into the abyss of death, especially of those we love, and we wonder if we have the faith we need, the strength to survive, the question rings in our ears: Who are these?

When we stumble in our work, and we feel inadequate to the task that God has given us, and that we didn’t ask for in the first place, the question echoes somewhere nearby: Who are these?

Who are these?  We are meant to see them clothed in white, but we are also meant to remember that once they wore another set of clothes, once they struggled, and fought, and doubted, and failed just as we do, and none of that obstructed the triumph that God planned for them.

Who are these? – as if we know!  This is not a test to see who of us can name the most saints.  Rather it is a reminder that it is not only the particularity of the individual saints that matters to us, but also the numberless plenitude of the saints.  For it is in this countlessness that we discover our own call to saintliness, that we see that there is room for someone as difficult as me, as unlikely as you to join their ranks, if we will.  And in times when so much else seems in short supply in the church, when both the harvest and the laborers seem scant, we are given a vision of the expanse of God’s power in the multitude of the personhood of his saints.

Who are these?  The question is not a rhetorical one – not in St. John’s Revelation, and not for us, either.  The answer matters, and it is specific, once the elder provides it; and it has nothing to do with the identities of the saints, per se:  These are they who have come out of the great ordeal; they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.  No greater honor awaits them, than to have been washed in the blood of the Lamb.  No more dignity can be shown them than to have been baptized into the death of their Lord.  No other life is worth living than the life lived in Christ’s service.

I don’t know, of course, if there is any such room among the anterooms of heaven, where attendants tend to the remains of the dead to prepare them for the life to come, and to dress them in white, and to hand out the palms, and to teach them the songs of Zion that fill the courts of heaven.  I don’t know if there is any correlating counterpart to the sad and dignified work that takes place in the military mortuary not too far from here.

But thanks in large measure to the saints – too countless to know by name – I do know a thing or two.

I know there is a Lamb who sits upon the throne, and I know who that Lamb is.

I know he died for me and for you, and for one and for all, that this broken world might be made whole somehow, and that we might find again the power of love.

I know his blood still flows in chalices wherever his promises are remembered, and wherever his one commandment is proclaimed that we should love one another.

I know that he has called you and me by name to be washed in the river of his blood.

And I know that when we do, we follow in the footsteps of a numberless throng, who now wear garments I hope to wear some day; who now hold palms as I hope to some day; who now sing songs I hope to sing some day.

Who are these, and where have they come from?  Who are these?  Who are these?  My friends, you know who they are.  They are the saints of God: more numerous than the stars, washed in the blood of the Lamb, singing the songs of Zion, and leading us on through our own pilgrimage through tumult, confusion, warfare, failure, terror, and shame, so that we may become blessed with them.

Who are these, indeed?!?  These are they who turn us again and again toward the throne of the Lamb, who teach us to walk in their footsteps – fearsome though it may be. 

These are they who know the power of the risen Christ. 

These are they who have learned to love one another as Jesus loves them. 

These are they who have been washed in his blood; who know that worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive glory and wisdom and thanksgiving and honor and power and might for ever and ever!

“For this reason they are before the throne of God, and worship him day and night within his temple, and the one who is seated on the throne will shelter them.  They will hunger no more, and thirst no more; the sun will not strike them, nor any scorching heat; for the Lamb at the center of the throne will be their shepherd, and he will guide them to springs of the water of life, and God will wipe away every tear from their eyes.”

Who are these, and where have they come from?  My friends, you are the ones that know! Thanks be to God!

 

Preached by Fr. Sean Mullen

The Feast of All Saints 2014

Saint Mark’s Church, Philadelphia

Posted on November 2, 2014 .

Render to God

This past August at a Starbucks in Florida there was another outbreak of the “Pay-It-Forward” phenomenon.  What happens is this: You drive up and place your order, and by the time you move up to the next window to collect your latte and pay for it, the guy behind you has ordered, and the guy in front of you has paid.  You are told that the guy in front of you also paid for you, and so you are presented with the opportunity to do the same for the guy behind you.

Various different episodes of this “caffeinated kindness,” as one writer called it, have been reported in recent years.  In Connecticut last Christmas, the kindness lasted for four days and nearly 1500 customers who paid for the coffee of the car behind them.  In Florida this past summer, it seems that 378 people paid for the coffee of the car behind them at the drive-thru, over the course of about eleven hours.  The charity came to an end when finally a customer was not willing to pay for the car behind him or her.  The barista who served this customer tried to find a way to forgive him or her, saying he didn’t “believe the final customer understood the pay-it-forward concept.”[i]

The next day the media were reporting, I guess, that the whole thing had started again – people paying for the coffee of the car behind them.  And here’s where it gets interesting…  Because some guy who is hearing this on the radio or TV, or on the web, or wherever, decides that it’s an outrage.  He decides that this is not a pattern of spontaneous generosity because the baristas are suggesting (maybe even asking) that drivers pay for the car behind them.  That information puts this guy – whose name I will withhold to protect him – in a tizzy.  That’s not generosity, he decides, that’s guilt.  So he drives over to the Starbucks in question, orders two Venti Mocha Frappuccinos (one for him and one for his wife), and declines, flat out, to pay for the car behind him.[ii]

So let’s cast this guy in the role of the villain.  Let’s say he’s the bad guy in this story.  I’m not saying he has horns and is marked with the sign of the beast, I’m saying, for my purposes, he is going to be the villain toda… not only because he insisted that his way of seeing things must be the only good and proper way of seeing things; not only because he put an end to a good thing for no good reason; not only because he squelched the spirit of generosity and kindness that this world is sorely in need of (even if only at the drive-thru of a Starbucks); not only because he felt moved to get up and into his car and make the effort to drive to this coffee shop with the sole purpose of choking off the good and decent impulses of his fellow citizens; but also because, if you think about it, he is the only guy all day who actually got free coffee out of the deal!  Yes, in his self-righteousness our villain remains the only person who benefited from the generosity of the guy in front of him without assuming any cost at all for the guy behind him, so he drives away with coffee that cost him nothing.

There’s more than a hint of self-righteousness in the attitude of the guys who track down Jesus to challenge him about paying taxes to Caesar.  The situation is different, but similar.  They have been hearing that this guy Jesus is challenging their authority.  He’s been telling parables that suggest that the poor and the outcast are every bit as likely to be favored by God – and maybe more so – than those who hold high status in the religious pecking order.  But who is Jesus to be turning over the tables in the Temple?  Who is he to speak well of tax-collectors and prostitutes?  Who is he to criticize them?

So when news reaches them of this guy who is upsetting the established order of things, they get up and take themselves over to find him and put a stop to all this, possessed of pretty much the same attitude of self-righteousness with which our villain was possessed.  And although times have changed, they must not have changed all that much because these guys decide that they will try to trip Jesus up with a challenge about taxes, which, just like in current American political discourse, you must never ever actually say are acceptable, because then you will identify yourself as a socialist at best, and probably something much more subversive than that.  I don’t know what the label they would have pinned on Jesus would have been, but I am sure they had one at the ready.

And how frustrating it must have been to find that this guy, Jesus, who has actually only recently arrived in Jerusalem, is able so successfully to turn the tables on them by refusing to let the conversation be about taxes.  “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.”  Pay it forward, boys, he might have said.  Pay it forward.

You can always find a good reason not to do so.  You can always find a reason to take offense.  You can always decide that one man’s generosity is another man’s guilt, and that you are not going to play that game.  So you can always put a stop to the spirit of generosity and kindness, and choke off the good and decent impulses of others by impugning them one way or another.  You can always find a way to justify not rendering to Caesar what Caesar thinks you owe him – and this ancient tradition is enshrined in the insane American tax code, and keeps a lot of political and commercial wheels turning in our own day and age.

The flip side, of course, is that you can always find a way to justify not rendering to God the things that might be God’s, because, well, who I am or – or anyone else – to tell you what you should be paying to God?

And it is absolutely correct that I have no idea what you should be giving to God.  I have no idea what number of hours you might offer in God’s service.  I have no idea what talents you might share with the church.  I have no idea how much money you should give away to strengthen God’s church and to build up God’s kingdom.  I have no idea how much.

But I do know how easy it is to decide not to do it at all.  It’s actually even easier than it is to put an end to the Starbuck’s Pay-It-Forward, because at Starbucks you at least have to confront the barista who has asked you if you’ll pay for the car behind you.  But to decide not to give to God, you don’t have to confront anyone at all.  All you have to do is say nothing, and do as little, and give as little as you want, or less.

Thank God people give at Saint Mark’s.  Every year a goodly number of us make a pledge to give all year long, and a fair number also just give something as the plate is passed.  The story we have to tell here at Saint Mark’s is definitely a story of people who give.

Now, paying-it-forward is not by any means the perfect model of Christian stewardship; I don’t think that the sole reason we should give is because the person before you gave.  But it is useful to remember that we are standing in a line here – a long line that stretches back about 165 years, over which time people have been giving and giving and giving.  And at Saint Mark’s we are surrounded by signs of deeply generous giving.

And every year there comes a time when I am going to stand in front of you like a barista and ask if you are willing to give, too, if you are willing to continue that good spirit of generosity and kindness.  And, as I say, the story here is that we usually get a pretty long line of people who are willing to say yes, and who find the good and decent impulse to give near at hand.

But I suppose that there are some who just don’t understand the giving concept.  And I suppose that in each of us there is a little bit of that guy inside us who thinks maybe this is more about guilt than about generosity, and who thinks to himself: why should I be forced to give, just because people ahead of me in line have been convinced to do so?  And since the people ahead of me in line have already been convinced to give, why do I even need to give at all, since everything seems to be paid for already?

Of course the little bit of that guy who occupies a space inside us never actually acknowledges that he is the only guy who benefits from the generosity of the guy in front of him without assuming any cost at all for the guy behind him; the only guy who drives away with free coffee.  So that’s one thing.

But here’s another thing: Render to God the things that are God’s. 

There are those who, in their self-righteousness, actually believe that everything they have belongs to them, and who cannot see that everything we have comes from God’s graciousness.  And that’s another sermon.

But to those of us who recognize that God is the giver of all good things, it is not the question of paying taxes that we have to think carefully about, it’s the giving to God the things that are God’s that takes careful consideration.

And for that there is another kind of guy about whom we never hear in the papers or on the news, or on the Internet.  There is this guy who is sitting at home, listening to the news that there are people lined up someplace at a drive-thru, paying for the car behind them.  And this guy thinks that this is a pretty good idea, and so he gets in his car and drives down to Starbucks, even though he doesn’t like the coffee there and thinks it costs too much, and he feels ridiculous ordering a “Venti” anything when you could just say “Extra Large.”

And he lines up behind the cars in front of him and keeps looking in his rear view mirror, hoping to get a glimpse of whomever it is going to be who gets behind him.  And he is hoping it will be a mom in a minivan who is harried by her kids, or a couple who have been recently arguing and need to find a way to forgive each other, or a guy in a beat up old Buick who is frustrated with his job search, or a older person who is wondering whether or not she should still be driving.  You know, someone who is in need of something more than just caffeine.

And this guy is the hero of our story – the truly un-sung hero.  He has adjusted his day for the sole purpose of keeping the pay-it-forward going.  He has gone out of his way to encourage the spirit of generosity and kindness; to add his own jolt of energy to the good impulses of his neighbors.  And remember, he doesn’t even like Starbucks coffee that much!  You know you are giving to God the things that are God’s when you are behaving like this guy – who, remember, doesn’t even get any credit for it.

It’s not because he did a careful calculation of how many coffees he could afford to buy, and then prayed that a car with only one person and who’d order only a Short Macchiato would pull up behind him.  In fact, I strongly suspect that after he paid for one car behind him, this guy circled around the block, came back, and did it again!  And he probably gave away the first coffee he bought as he drove around the block!

There is part of that guy in each of us too.  I want to be like that guy.  And I want you to be like that guy, too.  Because when we become like that guy then we begin to know what it is we have that is really God’s, so we can give to God the things that are God’s.  Then we begin to see our lives as the gifts they are – given to us by God, so much paid for by someone else in front of us, who knew that her life was a gift from God.  And this guy, so far, has no name; remains, so far, un-identified.  We don’t even know, to tell the truth, whether or not this guy exists.  Which means that this guy could be me, and this guy could be you, if we will render to God the things that are God’s!

 

Preached by Fr. Sean Mullen

19 October 2014

Saint Mark’s Church, Philadelphia

[i] USA Today online, August 21, 2014

[ii] saintpetersblog.com, August 21, 2014, by Peter Schorsch

Posted on October 19, 2014 .