Less of My Manure, More of His

Most couples who come to me to talk about getting married are not looking for advice.  They want to talk about the ceremony – at least the brides do; the grooms are often not sure they want to talk to a priest at all.  But the church requires me to spend some time with every couple I marry, and I would want to do so even if it wasn’t required.  In addition to talking about the ceremony, I always ask couples a series of questions that fall under the heading “Questions Couples Should Ask Before They Marry – Or Wish They Had”.  These questions include asking if they have discussed children, whether their ideas of saving and spending money are in sync, and whether or not they will have a TV in the bedroom.

But there is a topic not covered in the questions that I feel it is important to discuss, and which compels me to give to the couple the only piece of advice that I give about marriage.  The topic is forgiveness.

I know couples whose basic position about forgiveness is this: that they can forgive the other almost anything, except….  The “except” is big: a line in the sand that must not be crossed.  And if a couple has thought about this (although I suspect that many don’t really think about it until after the wedding day) that exception is one thing and one thing only: infidelity.

As I said, most couples don’t come to me looking for advice, and I am not inclined to give it about marriage.  But on the topic of forgiveness, I am not inclined to keep silent.

And although love-besotted brides and grooms probably pay me little mind when they hear me say it, my advice to them is to begin their married life with no line in the sand; no exception established in either’s mind from the outset for which forgiveness could not be sought and offered in return.  Not even if there is infidelity.  No exceptions at all.  This is not to say that I believe there are never circumstances in which a marriage could and should rightly end in divorce, sad though that would be.  I am only saying that couples should not begin their married lives knowing that there is something the marriage could not survive, for lack of forgiveness.

My rationale for this piece of advice is found in what I believe and know about God: that there is no exception to God’s forgiveness.  And that even in the simple prayer Jesus taught us to pray we ask God to “forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us,” and I think husbands and wives and partners ought to mean that when they say it – or at least try.

Brides and grooms-to-be have to sit and listen to my only piece of advice, which is premised on a lesson about God.  But almost no one else has to hear it – except of course a captive congregation who finds themselves sitting through a sermon!  And you may or may not need to hear advice about forgiving your spouse, your partner, your friend, or perhaps your enemy.  But if you are anything like me, you do need to be reminded the lesson about God.  Because many of us have somehow absorbed the idea that ours is a God who has drawn lines in the sand.  Our shorthand for this is to remember that we once heard it said that God is an angry and a jealous God.

To us, this sounds like a God who has all kinds of boundaries that may not, must not, cannot be crossed, or else….  And indeed we have lots of images of such an angry and jealous God who fills the skies with thunder clouds and lightning bolts as he prepares to wreak his vengeance on those who cross him.

But today Jesus has advice for those of us who believe this about God.

"A man had a fig tree planted in his vineyard; and he came looking for fruit on it and found none.  So he said to the gardener, 'See here!  For three years I have come looking for fruit on this fig tree, and still I find none.  Cut it down! Why should it be wasting the soil?'  He replied, 'Sir, let it alone for one more year, until I dig around it and put manure on it.  If it bears fruit next year, well and good; but if not, you can cut it down.'"

If I could only take one parable of the Scriptures with me to a desert island this would be it.  Because the fig tree, of course, is me (or you, if you care to put yourself in the story).  It requires no real stretch of my imagination to see that I have not been the person I could be; that I have not done all that I could with the gifts God’s given me; that in so many ways I have failed to bear the fruit of good works and kindness and love that God has made me for and calls me to.

Maybe you could say this about yourself as well.  The season of Lent is in some measure given to us to reflect on the ways we resemble the fig tree in this parable.  Notice that we do not even have to get to the things we have done wrong (although I believe we are free to remember those) it is enough to think about what we have failed to do – those things we have left undone, as we say.  Have I been faithful to God in prayer?  Have I been merciful to those who need my help?  Generous to those who deserve my largesse?  Kind to those who seek my fellowship?  Have I been available to those who need me and can rightly lay claim to that need?  Have I been gracious to those who just happen to find themselves in my sphere? 

Sometimes we have such low expectations of ourselves that we do pretty well by these measures, until we begin to expand our focus and see more of the world around us, the people we normally ignore, or have already shut out, those beyond the immediate company of our family and friends.  But God’s expectations of us are not low at all.  He has always called his people to be welcoming to strangers; to care for those who are needy not because we know them, but just because they are in need; to love not only those whom it’s easy for us to like, but even to love our enemies.  If this is the kind of fruit we are to bear in our lives, how are we doing?

Now, in the cartoon version of life that has become the common picture for many these days, I am supposed to rail at you from the pulpit about your many failings in these ways.  I am supposed to encourage your shame, identify you as sinners, affix a scarlet letter to your clothes, condemn you to a life of guilt, and threaten you with the fires of hell.  In this cartoon world, dour nuns wield stiff rulers to whack children’s hands; hypocritical priests hurl accusations at the innocent, suffering poor; and a greedy church takes from you what you can ill afford to give in order to fill her hallways with extravagance.  And no doubt the church has been guilty of all these cartoon crimes at one time or another.

But there is still the matter of the fig tree, which has failed to bear fruit year after year.  No one has guilted the fig tree about anything.  No one berated it in Catholic school when it was young.  No one took from it what was rightfully the tree’s and deprived it the chance to produce figs.  The tree was just planted and left to grow and do what fig trees do: to grow figs, which are sweet and wonderful and delicious.

But year after year the tree gives no figs.

The owner of the tree remembers that he heard once that ours is an angry and a jealous God; and he remembers too that he is made in God’s image (his is a selective memory).  A fig tree ought to produce figs; its owner has every right to expect them, he thinks.  What is the point of a fig-less fig tree, after all?  So cut that tree down and teach it a lesson – a lesson that will no doubt be noticed by all the other fig trees too!  Where is that ax?

But there is also a gardener – or at least someone who we think is the gardener, though he looks a little familiar to me, come to think of it.  This gardener is not the type to draw lines in the sand.  Is he disappointed by a fig tree that bears no figs?  Perhaps.  Is prepared to give up on it and cut it down?  No, he is not.  Does he believe a good strong dose of guilt or haranguing, or the threat of eternal damnation will induce the tree to grow figs?  It would appear not.

But the gardener has a pile of manure – which is neither expensive or exotic.  And he has time.  And he has a way with the owner of the tree.  “Sir,” he says, “let it alone one more year, until I dig around it and put manure on it.  If it bears fruit next year, well and good; but if not…” well, you know….

In my cartoon world, on my desert island, where this is the only parable I have to tell, it is told over and over, year after year.  The exasperated owner remembers that this is the third, no fourth, no fifth, no twentieth year in a row he has had this conversation with the gardener.  But always he relents, neither as angry or as jealous as he had at first seemed.

And in my cartoon world, there is an endless supply of manure to be heaped on this fig tree by the gardener, to help it grow, help it thrive, help it bear much fruit.

And of course in my cartoon world, I am the fig tree, peering out from beneath my leafy, but so far fig-less branches.  And I have heard the demands of the owner year after year, I have remembered that he sounds so much like a jealous and an angry God, but I notice that he always heeds the gardener.  And I am grateful that there is a pile of manure for me, because it is so hard to draw a line in a pile of manure, to define the limits of what the gardener will tolerate, what he will put up with, what he will forgive.  Indeed, to me, he seems to have no limit, no line that cannot be crossed.  He seems to me to have nothing but patience and plenty of manure to try to keep me humble, and to coax my limbs to finally bring forth fruit, and offer the first figs to him.

Preached by Fr. Sean Mullen

7 March 2010

Saint Mark’s Church, Philadelphia

Posted on March 7, 2010 .

Longing and desire

Somewhere near the heart of us is a wrenching longing. We experience it in different ways: as nostalgia, as homesickness, as restlessness, as grief and as mourning. Psychologists tell us that we learn to long from our birth, when we long for mother, to return to the warmth and comfort of the womb, and although we long in increasingly subtle ways, there is still the sense that we long interminably, desperately, at length – throughout our lives. From the beginning to our last breaths.

Sometimes we can put words to our longing – “love,” “friendship,” “beauty,” “home.” Sometimes it is a fundamentally ceaseless condition – a chronic desire that brooks no vocabulary – but perhaps a tune catches us, or a poem, or a sunset, and we know that ache which most haunts artists and those who are a little mad – that gives to the experience of life a poignance and depth, and which makes us restless to the end of our days.

I can never hear the Gospel from this morning without hearing in the words of Jesus a similar longing:

“Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to it! How often have I desired to gather your children together as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, and you were not willing!” “How often have I desired to gather your children together...”

The words grab me somewhere in my guts and twist, and whisper of so much longing – the longing that brings us to the edge of tears. Jesus' deep longing for his people comes through his words. There are in his words hints of the longing of the Israelites for a homeland, for a city of their own in the midst of their enemies, and there are hints of Jesus' own longing for his people that he loves, longs for and wishes to embrace. And there also the deep sadness in that longing, for even as Jesus wishes to embrace his people, he knows that they will not embrace him back, and even as his people long for a Messiah, they will receive Jesus no more than they received the prophets.

The longing, and the sadness and the desire in Jesus' words is maternal, like a mother hen, Jesus longs for his people, desires to gather and protect them. “Jerusalem, Jerusalem” – the longing, the sadness and the desire. This seems, at first blush, a strange little reading for this second Sunday of Lent. Jesus predicts his own death and resurrection, albeit in indirect, riddle-like ways, he scolds Herod, he scolds Jerusalem, and reveals his longing and desire for his people, and that is about it. There is no ethical teaching, no parable, and so I wonder if the longing and desire of Jesus for Jerusalem is not the teaching we are supposed to glean from this reading. I think perhaps the longing of these two sentences is perhaps more important to our Lenten journey than knowing what is to come when Jesus arrives at Jerusalem.

In the midst of this Lenten time when we are mindful of our sinfulness and the degree to which we fail to love God and fail to walk according to his commands – in the midst of this purgative time, when we give up food, or drink, or television (as my household has), we do it because we need to be reminded that Lent is about longing and desire, about an emptiness and a void, a sense of homelessness and a sense of incompleteness. Lent is about longing and desire and the longing and desire of fasting, of purgation, of mourning and desolation bring us again hopefully into the hunger and desire that we have for God. Lent is about what is lacking in our lives, or what is present and distorts our lives. And the longing and

the desire that is somewhere near the very heart of us is a longing and desire for something absent, that we replace with other things: people, or work, or money, or power, or those other little idols. All of which are there to shield us from the ache and the longing that we have for God.

Because we are not, as a culture, very good at living in a place of hunger, of desire, and of longing. We tend to foreclose, to satiate, to substitute, to anesthetize, but Lent and the longing and desire of Lent ask us to simply wait, and hope; to wait in the slow ache and agony of longing and desire for that which we cannot fully name, but which we recognize when we come face to face with it, or recognized reflected in the mirror of creation, or of a human face, or in a quiet sorrow.

The hope of this Lenten place is two-fold. One hope is that if we sit in the longing desirous waiting of Lent for long enough, we might come to recognize that our waiting, our desire, our longing is a reflection of a far greater desire and longing – Jesus looking at Jerusalem and longing for the people whose Messiah he is, and God longing for us like a lover, a mother, the Creator who made us for companionship, in his own image, and whose longing and desire is an infinite echoing cry of which ours is a slight tiny version.

We long, in other words, because God longs. We desire because God desires, and sets in us a similar desire to that which cries out in the Godhead. And so our longing and our desire is not ours alone, but part of the great symphony of the creation, echoed by stars and stones, even haltingly by foolish people.

The other hope of that this Lenten place is not eternal, that we will not have to wait forever in the slow agony of unsatisfied desire, but that someday, we will obtain what we desire, we will seek and find, we will receive “far more than we can ask or imagine.” Someday, we will get home.

For God desires us far more than we desire in our own halting fashion. God longs to welcome us, God longs, in a very real way, to have us, to possess us. And so Lent is not a punishment, but a training, not a mortification without cause, but a fast wherein we learn to taste again the heavenly food and drink, and to recognize our longing for what it is, not about any earthly thing, but a longing for Eden, for walking in the Garden with God, for the Other by which and for which we were created.

“Jerusalem, Jerusalem, how I long to gather your children...”

Preached by Fr. Andrew Ashcroft

Saint Mark's Church, Philadelphia

28 February 2010

 

Posted on March 2, 2010 .

Sled Dogs

All the snow that’s fallen on the east coast lately has clearly affected people’s thinking.  For instance, I read in the New York Times recently a piece about dog sledding that would normally seem somewhat esoteric.  But all the recent snowfall, and my pack of two dogs, has got me wondering.

In the Times, Verlyn Klinkenborg wrote about the wonder of being pulled on a sled by a team of dogs: “They don’t run for a reward or toward a goal — the greyhound’s mechanical rabbit. They get yelled at when they chew on the gangline and petted when the run is over. They don’t catch or flee anything. They would keep running if the musher fell off his sled.”[i] 

And he wonders, “Why do sled dogs run?” which they do with such un-restrained zeal.  He can only think of one-word answers: “love, joy, duty, obedience.”

I have friends in suburban Philadelphia with a Husky who corroborate this assessment of a sled dog: he lives to run.  They are very cautious not to let him run in unconfined areas or off the leash, they tell me, because once he starts running it is hard to get him to stop.

Most of us do not approach Lent with the zeal of a sled dog straining at his harness to begin a race.  We have devised Lent as a dreary time, when we tell ourselves that we are restrained, harnessed as it were to some unfortunate discipline.  Certainly we devise the rituals of our worship to underscore this idea.  The old fashioned prayers we sometimes say here, go on and on about our bodily fasting.

But, while I grew up in a house where we were very likely to be given Mrs. Paul’s fish sticks on a Friday in Lent, I doubt my parents are as scrupulous about the observance of meatless Fridays these days as they used to be, and I know that I am often careless in the observance.  I am guessing that perhaps your Lenten disciplines do not cramp your style too much.  And I know there is a city out there, and beyond, that would merely giggle at such thoughts.

The Gospel today invites us to consider temptations, but we are mostly so accustomed to yielding to our desires – because we can – that we hardly even know what temptation is any more, other than the occasional wish to consume more chocolate or more ice cream than we should.  Besides, Jesus’ temptation by Satan is of such a particular and scripted variety that it can seem to have little to do with us.

So I could enjoin you to be strict on your fasting, or whatever it is you have given up for Lent (if anything); and I could warn you against the power of Satan to tempt you.  But I doubt I would be getting very far or sound very compelling.  And since I normally preach to myself, I can tell you that I know I wouldn’t be making much headway with myself!

Which brings me back to the sled dogs, and that interesting comment: “They would keep running if the musher fell off his sled.”  This is not how I thought of a team of animals pulling a heavy sled.  I rather imagined that there was a whip involved, and a great deal of demanding, ordering, coercing, maybe even some denial of food – to keep the dogs hungry.  It’s hard for me to imagine the dogs enjoying being harnessed, longing for the run, the cold, the ice, the snow, the panting.  Very hard for me to imagine them simply wanting to run when it is not even required of them – for what?  The love, the joy, the duty, the obedience of it?  Can it be that there are creatures like this?  I confess I am not at all sure I see these traits in my own dogs.  But then, they were not made for it.

And what of you and me?  What were we made for?  This is a question so many of us struggle with, and many feel doomed to spend their whole lives wandering, not knowing the answer, since we are certain that it must have something to do with what we used to call our occupation, but now we imagine must be our passion.

During Lent, the Church suggests that whatever your occupation, you try living like a sled dog.  Which is to say, try living in the harness; listening for the call to go where you are instructed, rather than wherever you please; running hard, part of a team that is also harnessed; doing it not for the benefit of a reward, nor because of a whip that threatens you, but for the love of it, the joy of it, the duty of it, even the obedience of it.

This might mean taking something on during Lent, or giving something up.  It might mean doing something you have been avoiding, but that you know will be good for you or for those you love.  It clearly means testing a life that is different than the one we have been living.  Unlike a sled dog, it depends on each of us taking the time to think about what should or could be different, better in our lives, how we could become the better selves that we suspect lurk somewhere under the more selfish selves we see most often.

Would that involve a diet?  Fewer cigarettes?  A decision to go to an AA meeting for the first time?  Would it mean treating your partner or your spouse differently?  Calling your mother for the first time since who knows when?  Could it mean coming to church more often, or saying your prayers at home every day?  Might you decide to give some of your time to a cause or another person who needs you?  Is it possible it will cost you money as you learn to be more generous with others?  Only you will know, if you take the time to be honest with yourself.

And if you do, you may consider the possibility of changing your life with a certain dread, a wistfulness for giving up whatever ease, or indulgence, or habit, or wastefulness you are loathe to let go of.  It may seem to you that life could only be darker, smaller, less delightful if you are strapped into a harness and called on to run.

But it may be that you discover how wonderful it is to feel the cold air in your lungs, and your heart beating fast and strong, and the scenery whizzing by, and your team mates around you running hard and happily too.  Not because we are forced too, or because we are late, or because we are trying to catch or flee anything... but just for the love, joy, duty, and, yes, the obedience of living life more nearly to the way God made us to live it – with a bit less of us and a bit more of him.

And wouldn’t it be something if people saw the way you and I live our lives – with less of ourselves, and more of God – and wondered why; why do they run like that?  Would they suspect that it is because we have submitted to the whippings of an angry, demanding, and coercive God?

And wouldn’t it be wonderful to show that we could choose to live this way – making better choices, being our better selves – even when Lent is over?  Wouldn’t it be wonderful to discover that we could run just for the love, joy, duty, and obedience of it; that we would run even if the musher fell off his sled?

Preached by Fr. Sean Mullen

21 February 2010

Saint Mark’s Church, Philadelphia

 

 


[i] Klinkenborg, Verlyn.  “Why Do Sled Dogs Run?”  In The New York Times. 13 February 2010

Posted on February 21, 2010 .